Comparing Retirement Withdrawal Strategies
You’ve worked and saved for years, most of a career. Maybe you’re looking at a traditional retirement in your 60’s, or you’re one of the fortunate few who are able to consider earlier retirement.
Either way, you’ve amassed a sizable nest egg. Your assets are likely well into seven digits, unless you live very frugally, or can rely on a guaranteed pension.
That sounds like a formidable sum. You know it will last for years. But how long, exactly? And how should you start living off of it, making withdrawals, to guarantee it won’t run out?
Most of us without pensions will face these questions in our retirement. How do we safely withdraw from a lump sum over time so that it lasts as long as we do?
We know there is some baseline of living expenses that we must support. But then there are a host of discretionary and one-time expenses on our plate — travel, maintenance, new vehicles, emergencies.
When is it OK to spend this money, and when might it be damaging to the long-term survival of our portfolio? Is there a system, a technique, an investment, a product, that will keep us safe?
Comparing Retirement Withdrawal Strategies
Below I’ll do a high-level survey of all the many ways to withdraw from your nest egg in retirement. I’ll cover every method or strategy that I’m aware of, from a general perspective.
I’ll also discuss what I’ve done while navigating a decade of early retirement. I won’t get into hard numbers or simulations in this post.
By the end of this post you’ll have a good, general sense of your retirement withdrawal options — both their positives and negatives. And you’ll understand why there is no perfect answer to this question.
Every solution has its strengths, and its potential weaknesses. Only by understanding the possible approaches, then mixing them together into a personal solution, while remaining flexible, and still accepting some risk, will you be able to move forward and enjoy your retirement.
Fixed Retirement Withdrawals
Let’s start with one of the simplest and therefore most popular withdrawal methods. That is withdrawing a fixed amount from your portfolio on a periodic basis.
Typically this is implemented by also adjusting for inflation annually, so the nominal amount actually grows over time, but remains constant in real terms. In other words, you are maintaining the same lifestyle from year to year.
If the amount you start with, in year one of your retirement, is 4% of your portfolio, then this is the classic, but possibly obsolete, 4% Rule.
Advantages of Fixed Withdrawals
The advantages of this withdrawal method are that it is relatively simple to implement. And it has been studied exhaustively so you can easily find statistics on the survival probabilities for your portfolio, given a time span and asset allocation.
And this strategy is perfectly predictable — to a point. Your lifestyle is “locked in.” You know much you have to spend each year. Until your money runs out.
Disadvantages of Fixed Withdrawals
The chief drawback of the fixed withdrawal amount: Nobody can say for sure how long your money will last.
Yes, studies based on historical data show it might last for 30 years. But history may not repeat.
Unless you implement some kind of annual review, you will have no flexibility to make your money last longer, if needed. Nor will you be able to deal with emergency expenses, or enjoy splurges if your portfolio is doing well.
Variable Retirement Withdrawals
If you don’t withdraw a fixed amount from your portfolio every year, then it stands to reason you’ll be withdrawing a variable amount. But there are many formulas for computing that fluctuating withdrawal. Let’s review them.
You could withdraw a fixed percentage of your portfolio every year. Say you chose to withdraw exactly 5% of your portfolio every January, regardless of its current value or how the market had performed. This is often called an endowment withdrawal approach.
Advantages of a Fixed Percentage Approach
The great advantage of this is that it automatically builds some flexibility into your withdrawals as a function of market performance. If the market is up, your fixed percentage will be a larger sum. If the market is down, it will be smaller.
Even better, you will never run out of money! Because you are always withdrawing some percent of your portfolio, it will never be wiped out, mathematically speaking.
Disadvantages of a Fixed Percentage Approach
That sounds great until you look at the downside: your portfolio could get very small! Your lifestyle will fluctuate, perhaps dramatically, over the long term.
Lastly, although this withdrawal strategy is variable, it isn’t truly flexible. The market, not you, controls the size of annual withdrawals.
(For a different approach to a market-based withdrawal percentage, there are market valuation-based strategies. These advocate that you actually withdraw less when markets are high, because the projected returns going forward will be lower. There are pages of debate on this topic.)
Retirement Withdrawals Based on Life Expectancy
Another approach to computing a variable withdrawal sum every year has been gaining ground recently, and that is to base the withdrawal on your life expectancy. In its simplest form, each year you would withdraw one divided by your remaining life-expectancy in years. (For a simple source of life expectancy data, see the IRS RMD tables).
So if your age was such that your life expectancy was 30 years, you’d withdraw 1/30 or about 3.3% in the current year.
Advantages of Retirement Withdrawals Based on Life Expectancy
This approach has some intuitive appeal. You are dividing your money up evenly according to how many years you expect to remain living. And that expectation is updated annually based on statistics.
Again, you will never run out of money! But again, there is no guarantee exactly how much money you’ll have in your last year.
Disadvantages of Retirement Withdrawals Based on Life Expectancy
If you consider how the denominator in that formula works, along with the potential for asset growth, you’ll likely wind up with smaller withdrawals in early retirement, and possibly large withdrawals later.
That would be a potential criticism of this withdrawal method. Instead of “front loading” withdrawals so that you spend more in your early years when you have a greater chance of being alive, and are healthy to enjoy it, you are likely to “back load” the withdrawal process, saving too much until the end.
Guardrail Withdrawal Strategy
If you want to allow for more generous withdrawals up front, plus potential flexibility, yet institute some safety measures, you can go with a variable withdrawal strategy consisting of a fixed percentage with some bounds or guardrails.
There are some more modern versions of this strategy, but one of the first and simplest approaches came from Bob Clyatt in his groundbreaking book on early retirement Work Less, Live More. He calls his approach a better Safe Withdrawal Method with “The 95% Rule.”
You start by calculating 4% of your portfolio value every year. Then, to accommodate bad market years, you can withdraw either that 4% amount, or 95% of the amount you withdrew the previous year, whichever is larger. That means you never have to cut your lifestyle more than 5% in any given year.
Clyatt reports that there is minimal impact on portfolio success rates (generally just a few percentage points) from using his 95% rule. So you are able to “smooth” changes in your lifestyle, without taking on much additional risk of running out of money.
What if you want even more retirement guarantees? On the surface, annuities appear to solve almost all the problems of fixed and variable withdrawals. Almost.
With an annuity, you hand an insurance company some or all of your retirement portfolio. In exchange they give you income payments for life. That eliminates the possibility of outliving your assets. That’s a very good thing.
Of course that guarantee depends on the solvency of the insurance company and its backing state guaranty association, both of which ultimately depend on the markets and economy. That’s the first flaw in the annuity’s glossy exterior.
Annuities get high points for consistency. You are party to a contractual obligation that you will receive the same amount, year after year. But that’s also the chief problem with an annuity. It’s inflexible.
If you die early, you will likely have left quite a bit of money on the table. If you have an emergency and need a lump sum of money, you probably can’t get it. Only if you live a long time, and your expenses stay relatively constant, does the annuity solution come into its own.
But let’s take a closer look at those “lifetime” payments. We’re talking two, three, four or more decades of cash flow.
Is it inflation adjusted? Inflation can be a big deal over such time spans. And, today at least, true inflation-adjusted annuities are close to impossible to find.
The final drawback to an annuity is that you don’t get to keep your principal. So there is no option for emergency cash or leaving an inheritance with that particular portion of your assets.
Related: Annuities — The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
Flexible Capital Preservation
We’ve discussed fixed and variable withdrawals, and annuity payments, including the positives and significant negatives of each. These are all relatively static, idealized, or inflexible systems for withdrawing from assets in retirement. They make great case studies for performing research, running simulations, and publishing scholarly articles.
The problem is that to be simulated they must all make assumptions about the future of the economy and your personal financial situation. Assumptions that may not apply, or may not come to pass.
Now let me discuss what I think most people actually tend to do in retirement, at least early retirement. And, this is also what I’m doing, until I see better ideas and a more complete picture.
I will call this “Flexible Capital Preservation” — living off interest, dividends, growth, and some part-time work income, all with an eye to preserving assets. This is, in my view, the only sensible strategy for early retirement, where there are still decades of uncertainty yawning in front of you.
If you retire in your 50’s or earlier, with no inflation-adjusted pension in sight, it is simply unwise to draw down your retirement assets in any significant way. The goal should be to preserve (though not necessarily grow) your net worth, keep your powder dry, and not burn any bridges, until you are much further down the road.
How does this work in practice? Well, if your assets are large enough, or the markets are strong enough, you can afford to spend only your annual dividends and growth each year.
If that isn’t the case, then you will need to work part-time, possibly leveraging your relative financial independence to create a lifestyle business that supplements your investment income while in no way detracting from your quality of life.
Related: Should You Start a Business After Retiring?
Flexible Retirement Withdrawals
So how exactly do you go about withdrawing from investments when taking this flexible approach? I’ve been doing this for about a decade, in a generally rising market. That tailwind has made my financial life much easier.
But, regardless of the state of the economy, I would take a total return approach that might be characterized as “just in time,” or “active safe withdrawals” (as opposed to active investing). In other words, once or twice a year, when I need money, I sell some of my most appreciated assets.
Isn’t that a bit like market timing, in reverse? Maybe, maybe not. But a critical distinction is this: I’m selling in response to my own routine income needs, and not in response to market events.
But isn’t that still risky? What if the market tanks all of sudden? How do you avoid being forced to sell your assets at a loss?
This is where asset allocation comes into play. Some have formalized this as a buckets system — keeping less volatile assets like cash and bonds on hand for near-term living expenses.
Retirement Withdrawal Bucket Strategies
One prominent buckets strategy has been discredited, but the concept is intuitive to many and still useful for discussion purposes. In truth “buckets” are nothing more than another way to manage your asset allocation.
For me, it makes no sense to live off your conservative cash and bond buckets when stock markets are up. That’s like dipping into the storehouse when there is fresh, healthy grain available in the fields. Much better to be selling volatile equity assets when they are in favor, and to preserve your safe “buckets” for the bad times.
When, those bad times come, as they inevitably will, then the flexible withdrawal approach begins dipping into the safe cash and bond buckets that have been set aside. Ours are large enough to live off for a decade or more, before we might even have to consider spending more volatile equity assets at a loss.
There is research by Michael Kitces and Karsten Jeske suggesting that it may actually be better to spend bonds first, producing a rising equity allocation for the long term. So, if required by economic events, it is probably OK to spend down your conservative buckets to very low levels.
For optimal retirement income, you must take into account your economic environment. A flexible approach is best, validated by both intuition and research.
No Perfect Retirement Withdrawal Strategy
Every retirement withdrawal technique described above has drawbacks.
Some can’t guarantee that you won’t run out of money. You could die broke.
Some can’t guarantee your lifestyle. You could be living out of a trailer and eating cereal in your later years.
Others don’t guarantee principal. You might not have any money available for emergencies. And you might not have any left to pass on to your heirs.
Others still require active involvement and financial management. You or a spouse must be able and interested.
Despite all those drawbacks, the biggest problem with most of these withdrawal systems is precisely that they are an artificial system. Ask yourself if it is really possible to maintain any “system” consistently for the 20-40 year time span of a modern retirement?
Has there been any significant process that you undertake today precisely as you did decades ago? Whether it’s fixing your meals, maintaining your vehicles, planning your vacations, or managing your investments, there are ceaseless changes — both subtle and vast — over time.
The way I invest now is quite different from how I invested just 10-15 years ago. There is more and better information available. There are new, better, lower-cost investments available. My understanding and needs are different. Try as we might to stick with any financial system, things change.
Even annuities, which are arguably the most “reliable” retirement withdrawal system, suffer from change. Their payouts may seem predictable, but the world changes around them. Inflation could take off, seriously eroding their buying power. You could die early, or have serious emergency expenses — scenarios that are negative for annuities.
That’s why, when all is said and done, I believe most of us are going to construct a flexible, “hybrid” system for living off our assets in retirement. We’ll pick and choose from the options, combining them in an attempt to harvest most of the benefits, while minimizing the liabilities and preserving our flexibility.
In many cases we’ll try to create a guaranteed, inflation-adjusted income floor plus an upside of investment growth for recreation, emergencies, and legacy.
Though research is underway to compute the “optimal” formula for this hybrid retirement income stream, I remain somewhat pessimistic that there will ever be a perfect, turnkey, “just tell me what to do,” solution. All the same, I know that many of us will find solutions that are “good enough” to enjoy our retirement safely and comfortably.
Retirement Withdrawal Strategy Calculator
If you want to model different withdrawal strategies for your customized scenario, the Pralana Gold Retirement Calculator is an outstanding tool to visualize the range of potential outcomes possible when utilizing these different approaches.
* * *
This blog post was initially published December 16, 2013 and was most recently updated on December 6, 2021. It was lightly edited to improve readability, link to more current research, and highlight the calculator that enables you to model these strategies.- CM
* * *
- The Best Retirement Calculators can help you perform detailed retirement simulations including modeling withdrawal strategies, federal and state income taxes, healthcare expenses, and more. Can I Retire Yet? partners with two of the best.
- New Retirement: Web Based High Fidelity Modeling Tool
- Pralana Gold: Microsoft Excel Based High Fidelity Modeling Tool
- Free Travel or Cash Back with credit card rewards and sign up bonuses.
- Monitor Your Investment Portfolio
- Sign up for a free Personal Capital account to gain access to track your asset allocation, investment performance, individual account balances, net worth, cash flow, and investment expenses.
- Our Books
- Choose FI: Your Blueprint to Financial Independence
- Can I Retire Yet: How To Make the Biggest Financial Decision of the Rest of Your Life
- Retiring Sooner: How to Accelerate Your Financial Independence
* * *
[The founder of CanIRetireYet.com, Darrow Kirkpatrick relied on a modest lifestyle, high savings rate, and simple passive index investing to retire at age 50 from a career as a civil and software engineer. He has been quoted or published in The Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch, Kiplinger, The Huffington Post, Consumer Reports, and Money Magazine among others. His books include Retiring Sooner: How to Accelerate Your Financial Independence and Can I Retire Yet? How to Make the Biggest Financial Decision of the Rest of Your Life.]
* * *
Disclosure: Can I Retire Yet? has partnered with CardRatings for our coverage of credit card products. Can I Retire Yet? and CardRatings may receive a commission from card issuers. Other links on this site, like the Amazon, NewRetirement, Pralana, and Personal Capital links are also affiliate links. As an affiliate we earn from qualifying purchases. If you click on one of these links and buy from the affiliated company, then we receive some compensation. The income helps to keep this blog going. Affiliate links do not increase your cost, and we only use them for products or services that we're familiar with and that we feel may deliver value to you. By contrast, we have limited control over most of the display ads on this site. Though we do attempt to block objectionable content. Buyer beware.
Join more than 18,000 subscribers.
Get free regular updates from "Can I Retire Yet?" on saving, investing, retiring, and retirement income. New articles weekly.
Excellent post, Darrow! This is a topic that really interests me so I look forward to your future articles.
My plan is quite similar to your Flexible Capital Preservation approach but is a bit more risky in that I plan to work more in the down years, rather than rely on a cash/bond bucket. Since I’m in my 30s and plan to maintain my skills during early/semi retirement (I’m a professional software developer), I plan on picking up some consulting work in the particularly bad years. Not only will this allow me to keep most of my portfolio in equities and provide additional capital to invest when prices are low, it will also make me appreciate my early retirement when I go back to real work for a few months 🙂
I understand that it is usually difficult to find work during downturns but based on the current state of the software industry and the fact that my job can be done from anywhere (which means I could potentially work for anyone), I feel confident that I would be able to pick up additional work when necessary.
I hope you and Caroline have a great Christmas and I look forward to reading more about your retirement income strategies in 2014!
Thanks Mad Fientist. Your strategy makes sense, and you are fortunate to have one of those select career skills that can sell even in a downturn. Thanks for the holiday wishes, and stay in touch!
Darrow, it’s nice to see that people still remember Bob Clyatt’s 4%/95% guideline. That was a big (and expensive) research project when he published his “Work Less, Live More”. I’m hoping to see that type of logic become standard in more variable spending simulations.
I’ve learned that keeping two years of expenses in cash (6%-10% of a portfolio) can help a lot during a bear market. We replenish the cash stash when the markets are up. Spending it down for two years will get you through almost any recession. Wade Pfau has looked at this a little bit but there’s lots left to be done.
Thanks Doug. I appreciate Clyatt’s guideline. It’s a simple way to capture the idea of cutting back in a downturn. Some of the better retirement calculators offer similar logic. And thanks for your real-world experience. Good to know that two years of cash has bridged most recent recessions. I’m interested in any research in this area too.
Thanks Darrow for this article.
I’ve been reading Morningstar’s bucket system but you said one system was discredited. Could you quickly summarize it? Morningstar has stress tested their bucket approach as I’ve seen in their articles a few months ago.
I’ve been working on my retirement spending plan and I’ve incorporated a bucket approach that tries to keep money I need in a 5 year window outside the stock market. What I like about the bucket system is that it lets me see how to optimize my allocation and contain my risk. You always replenish your cash from stocks in an up market but in a severe down market you get your cash from the conservative buckets. The catch in this is that bond funds appear scary now since the interest rate can’t go lower and are more than likely to rise leaves me the impression that bond funds are a bad gamble in these times.
Now couple the bucket system with a withdrawal plan that I will call 99% Probability of Success (POS). The annual spending rate is based upon a montecarlo like flexible retirement planner that allows you to input actual streams of income (pension, short term pension supplement, wife’s pension, two Social Security streams) an planned expenses (like buying a car or purchasing a home) It statistically models the markets so you can input a spend rate that gives you a 99% POS. Each year or in the event of a significant down market you recalculate your 99% POS rate and adjust your allowance. The 99% POS gets adjusted each year based upon life expectancy changes and market growth. In my studies I did not let the spend rate grow faster than inflation. I believe that changes made the earliest possible when the market turns down provides more salvation to the spend plan that delayed changes. In my modeling of my own financial scenario being flexible like this turns your spend plan into a lifetime safe plan however, 97% POS did not work as it produced financial failures (totally running out of money/savings).
Hi Ralph, thanks for the details on your spending plan. Sounds like you have done a very thorough and careful analysis for your personal income and expenses, which is always going to be most accurate.
If you can afford a 99% POS, my hat is off to you. The downside of that high margin of safety might be that you leave lifestyle on the table in many possible outcomes. Some experts suggest lower probabilities of success are OK.
Your bucket implementation sounds similar to mine, in general. As you point out, in today’s climate, we can’t put all our faith in bond buckets.
It’s the “Buckets of Money” strategy that came under fire: you can Google for details.
Thanks again for the detailed comment.
Nicely done Darrow!
I just made a link to this post an Addendum here: http://jlcollinsnh.com/2013/12/05/stocks-part-xx-early-retirement-withdrawal-strategies-and-roth-conversion-ladders-from-a-mad-fientist/
Which is turn is a guest post from the Mad Fientist who commented above. Circle of life. 😉
Thanks Jim, and I appreciate the addendum. It’s an honor to be a small part of your highly-recommended stock series!
I am new to your site, as my wife and I are coming up to late-early financial independence in early 2015. We’ve run several of the retirement models (Quicken, T Rowe Price Future Path, and Market Watch Visual Planner) that all show high confidence in the assets-income-spending scenarios out to age 95. Establishing the specifics of a withdrawal strategy is our next task and this post is a good tour of the many ways to go about it. Right now we are thinking about delaying Social Security through an optimizing approach and using my modest inflation adjusting pension and our retirement accounts to fund the first six to eight years of financial freedom. The way I look at this is that we are essentially “buying” increased inflation adjusting SS annuities by using our asset accounts, and should be able to cover 80% of planned spending with pension and SS when we both hit 70 (my wife is a couple years younger). We’ve been steady dollar cost averaging investors, aggressive on the equities allocation in index funds, ignoring all market swings (despite some queasiness at times). But how to manage taking money out in a tax efficient and sustainable way is the tricky part. I’m hoping your site can help in getting our heads around the ins and outs of this.
Hi Jerry, welcome, and thanks for the comment. Congrats on your planning. You’ve certainly prepared well and done all the right things leading up to retirement. I agree with your views on Social Security. Everything I read tells me it makes sense for those with the means to delay taking it as long as possible. (Though in some cases it may be a good compromise to have the lower-earning spouse start sooner.) FYI, my go-to reference for dealing with Social Security is Mike Piper’s excellent book: Social Security Made Simple.
Withdrawing from retirement assets in a sustainable and tax efficient way is going to be a main focus of mine. I’ll be learning as I go, and sharing the details as best I can. I’m always interested in others’ insights too, so feel free to add yours. Thanks again.
I recently met with a financial wealth planner who was a huge advocate of “LIRP’s”. (Life Insurance Retirement Plan). I “suspect” this is a commissionable product. I asked the planner is she acted as a fiduciary and she said yes. Am very curious is you have heard of LIRPs. The planner was also stating that when (not “if”) taxes go up, LIRPs will be even more advantageous to the policy holder.
Your thoughts on LIRPs? Many thanks! Also curious if any of your readers have thoughts on LIRPs.
Do you already own a policy with a cash value built up? If not, I would ask why you would want to buy insurance now. Or was this a topic she initiated?
“Knowing” how to predict the future with taxes makes me skeptical as well. If she knows what the future holds (sarcasm), why insure against an unknown future?
Sounds like it would be wise to get a second opinion based on this limited bit of information.
Last year we had a similar situation where there was significant cash value in a whole life policy a retired relative no longer needed(he no longer wanted life insurance). We (I help this relative w/ finances) were pitched a LIRP, and after looking at the pro’s and con’s we decided the fees and complexity were not worth it. Instead we surrendered the policy and invested the proceeds.
Annuities have, at least, one advantage that you have missed: They protect against cognitive decline.
Older people are often targets of con men. Should an older person be subjected to theft, well he can only get this months pay. Next month the annuity company sends him another check.
No, it is not perfect, but it is real.
I agree. However, the simplest and therefore arguably best annuities are Single Premium Immediate annuities.
If you buy them before starting to experience any cognitive decline, you risk buying something you may never need. If you wait until you are starting to experience cognitive decline to shop for an annuity, you’re vulnerable to unscrupulous salespeople who may sell you an annuity not in your best interest.
This is definitely a challenging problem with many trade-offs.
Solid and much needed post.
>>The way I invest now is quite different from how I invested just 10-15 years ago. There is more and better information available. <<
Yet on the subject of retirement withdrawal strategy, you highlight a book written in 2007, and speak of 'modern' research, referencing an article by Wade Pfau written in 2013.
The science of retirement distribution has advanced leaps and bounds since then. Perhaps a follow-up compiling some of the more relevant research of the past decade may be in order. In that respect, Mr. Pfau may be of service, as he has done much of the heavy lifting of late.
Pfau just released a book entitled “Retirement Planning Guidebook” which is a good source of info and touches on this topic as well
Pfau’s book is on my reading list. Look for a review in the coming year.
Darrow, great to have a post from you! I would direct you and your readers toward Kartsten’s EarlyReitrementNow’s SWR series (https://earlyretirementnow.com/safe-withdrawal-rate-series/) which includes an excellent Google workbook that can be copied and used to model one’s own safe withdrawal rate. Karsten has written a lot about his approach and rationale which is based on the worst case historic retirement cohorts. This is the soundest math I’ve seen, from a PhD in economics and (very) early retireee.
Enjoyed your post, particularly where you stated that you sell your ‘appreciated assets’ when you need money. My wife and I have been retired for a year and a half and have used only our cash bucket accounts. I’m having a hard time trying to convince myself to sell my biggest gainers to replenish the cash even though our retirement assets have increased substantially since retirement. We want to travel while we are still physically able but it’s tough to become a spender after being a saver for so many years.
Comments are closed.